Mercurial > repos > bjoern-gruening > bismark
diff tool-data/bowtie2_indices.loc.sample @ 3:7eefe5d6eecd draft
reupload
author | bjoern-gruening |
---|---|
date | Tue, 25 Dec 2012 05:54:01 -0500 |
parents | |
children |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/tool-data/bowtie2_indices.loc.sample Tue Dec 25 05:54:01 2012 -0500 @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +#This is a sample file distributed with Galaxy that enables tools +#to use a directory of Bowtie2 indexed sequences data files. You will +#need to create these data files and then create a bowtie_indices.loc +#file similar to this one (store it in this directory) that points to +#the directories in which those files are stored. The bowtie2_indices.loc +#file has this format (longer white space characters are TAB characters): +# +#<unique_build_id> <dbkey> <display_name> <file_base_path> +# +#So, for example, if you had hg18 indexed stored in +#/depot/data2/galaxy/bowtie2/hg18/, +#then the bowtie2_indices.loc entry would look like this: +# +#hg18 hg18 hg18 /depot/data2/galaxy/bowtie2/hg18/hg18 +# +#and your /depot/data2/galaxy/bowtie2/hg18/ directory +#would contain hg18.*.ebwt files: +# +#-rw-r--r-- 1 james universe 830134 2005-09-13 10:12 hg18.1.ebwt +#-rw-r--r-- 1 james universe 527388 2005-09-13 10:12 hg18.2.ebwt +#-rw-r--r-- 1 james universe 269808 2005-09-13 10:12 hg18.3.ebwt +#...etc... +# +#Your bowtie2_indices.loc file should include an entry per line for each +#index set you have stored. The "file" in the path does not actually +#exist, but it is the prefix for the actual index files. For example: +# +#hg18canon hg18 hg18 Canonical /depot/data2/galaxy/bowtie2/hg18/hg18canon +#hg18full hg18 hg18 Full /depot/data2/galaxy/bowtie2/hg18/hg18full +#/orig/path/hg19 hg19 hg19 /depot/data2/galaxy/bowtie2/hg19/hg19 +#...etc... +# +#Note that for backwards compatibility with workflows, the unique ID of +#an entry must be the path that was in the original loc file, because that +#is the value stored in the workflow for that parameter. That is why the +#hg19 entry above looks odd. New genomes can be better-looking. +#