|
0
|
1 # ORF.0.472_0.8077298255.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
2 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
3 ORF.0.472_0.8077298255.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
4 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
5 # ORF.0.465_0.466377183402.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
6 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
7 ORF.0.465_0.466377183402.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
8 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
9 # ORF.0.466_0.685859290271.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
10 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
11 ORF.0.466_0.685859290271.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
12 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
13 # ORF.0.468_0.803001272192.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
14 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
15 ORF.0.468_0.803001272192.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
16 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
17 # ORF.0.708_0.889453606077.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
18 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
19 ORF.0.708_0.889453606077.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
20 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
21 # ORF.0.458_0.61399204562.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
22 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
23 ORF.0.458_0.61399204562.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
24 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
25 # ORF.0.459_0.323250347541.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
26 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
27 ORF.0.459_0.323250347541.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
28 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
29 # ORF.0.460_0.509039455004.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
30 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
31 ORF.0.460_0.509039455004.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
32 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
33 # ORF.0.461_0.392081904542.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
34 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
35 ORF.0.461_0.392081904542.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
36 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
37 # ORF.0.699_0.764949625216.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
38 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
39 ORF.0.699_0.764949625216.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
40 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
41 # ORF.0.703_0.981371874022.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
42 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
43 ORF.0.703_0.981371874022.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
44 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
45 # ORF.0.705_0.438813830323.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
46 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
47 ORF.0.705_0.438813830323.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
48 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
49 # ORF.0.622_0.865794102081.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
50 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
51 ORF.0.622_0.865794102081.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
52 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
53 # ORF.0.623_0.846988205141.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
54 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
55 ORF.0.623_0.846988205141.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
56 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
57 # ORF.0.625_0.0578111846669.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
58 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
59 ORF.0.625_0.0578111846669.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
60 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
61 # ORF.0.626_0.303786861772.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
62 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
63 ORF.0.626_0.303786861772.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
64 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
65 # ORF.0.630_0.467112600707.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
66 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
67 ORF.0.630_0.467112600707.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
68 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
69 # ORF.0.631_0.2883116125.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
70 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
71 ORF.0.631_0.2883116125.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
72 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
73 # ORF.0.636_0.876600016398.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
74 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
75 ORF.0.636_0.876600016398.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
76 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
77 # ORF.0.640_0.0888066128056.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
78 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
79 ORF.0.640_0.0888066128056.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
80 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
81 # ORF.0.655_0.212962186525.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
82 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
83 ORF.0.655_0.212962186525.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
84 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
85 # ORF.0.659_0.370352364369.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
86 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
87 ORF.0.659_0.370352364369.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
88 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
89 # ORF.0.660_0.561664408596.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
90 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
91 ORF.0.660_0.561664408596.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
92 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
93 # ORF.0.662_0.547739243117.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
94 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
95 ORF.0.662_0.547739243117.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
96 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
97 # ORF.0.667_0.381504311163.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
98 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
99 ORF.0.667_0.381504311163.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
100 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
101 # ORF.0.457_0.112605087319.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
102 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
103 ORF.0.457_0.112605087319.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
104 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
105 # ORF.0.518_0.704496503167.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
106 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
107 ORF.0.518_0.704496503167.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
108 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
109 # ORF.0.531_0.284124356131.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
110 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
111 ORF.0.531_0.284124356131.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
112 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
113 # ORF.0.534_0.230486359187.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
114 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
115 ORF.0.534_0.230486359187.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
116 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
117 # ORF.0.549_0.435747482069.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
118 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
119 ORF.0.549_0.435747482069.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
120 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
121 # ORF.0.603_0.488926379773.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
122 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
123 ORF.0.603_0.488926379773.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
124 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
125 # ORF.0.605_0.950422684088.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
126 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
127 ORF.0.605_0.950422684088.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
128 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
129 # ORF.0.606_0.329949811104.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
130 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
131 ORF.0.606_0.329949811104.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
132 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
133 # ORF.0.611_0.815705221168.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
134 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
135 ORF.0.611_0.815705221168.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
136 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
137 # ORF.0.613_0.104890641676.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
138 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
139 ORF.0.613_0.104890641676.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
140 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
141 # ORF.0.17_0.711047642618.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
142 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
143 ORF.0.17_0.711047642618.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
144 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
145 # ORF.0.139_0.904626958426.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
146 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
147 ORF.0.139_0.904626958426.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
148 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
149 # ORF.0.445_0.286571403109.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
150 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
151 ORF.0.445_0.286571403109.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
152 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
153 # ORF.0.345_0.971616620883.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
154 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
155 ORF.0.345_0.971616620883.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
156 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
157 # ORF.0.347_0.0208968983552.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
158 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
159 ORF.0.347_0.0208968983552.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
160 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
161 # ORF.0.517_0.929120702544.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
162 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
163 ORF.0.517_0.929120702544.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
164 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
165 # ORF.0.146_0.351389104617.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
166 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
167 ORF.0.146_0.351389104617.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
168 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
169 # ORF.0.439_0.445866101899.CDS TMH score=6.51858 margin=6.713639
|
|
|
170 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
171 ORF.0.439_0.445866101899.CDS LipoP1.0:Best TMH 1 1 6.51858
|
|
|
172 ORF.0.439_0.445866101899.CDS LipoP1.0:Margin TMH 1 1 6.713639
|
|
|
173 ORF.0.439_0.445866101899.CDS LipoP1.0:Class SpI 1 1 -0.195059
|
|
|
174 ORF.0.439_0.445866101899.CDS LipoP1.0:Class CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
175 ORF.0.439_0.445866101899.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 20 21 -0.295218 # SPGVP|CIMLL
|
|
|
176 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
177 # ORF.0.440_0.915263915342.CDS TMH score=0.241158 margin=0.442071
|
|
|
178 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
179 ORF.0.440_0.915263915342.CDS LipoP1.0:Best TMH 1 1 0.241158
|
|
|
180 ORF.0.440_0.915263915342.CDS LipoP1.0:Margin TMH 1 1 0.442071
|
|
|
181 ORF.0.440_0.915263915342.CDS LipoP1.0:Class CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
182 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
183 # ORF.0.183_0.0663532791257.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
184 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
185 ORF.0.183_0.0663532791257.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
186 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
187 # ORF.0.185_0.343675913625.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
188 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
189 ORF.0.185_0.343675913625.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
190 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
191 # ORF.0.580_0.42130451371.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
192 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
193 ORF.0.580_0.42130451371.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
194 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
195 # ORF.0.429_0.211525337226.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 margin=0.370359
|
|
|
196 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
197 ORF.0.429_0.211525337226.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
198 ORF.0.429_0.211525337226.CDS LipoP1.0:Margin CYT 1 1 0.370359
|
|
|
199 ORF.0.429_0.211525337226.CDS LipoP1.0:Class TMH 1 1 -0.571272
|
|
|
200 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
201 # ORF.0.202_0.502577350308.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
202 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
203 ORF.0.202_0.502577350308.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
204 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
205 # ORF.0.217_0.854168148494.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 margin=1.810677
|
|
|
206 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
207 ORF.0.217_0.854168148494.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
208 ORF.0.217_0.854168148494.CDS LipoP1.0:Margin CYT 1 1 1.810677
|
|
|
209 ORF.0.217_0.854168148494.CDS LipoP1.0:Class SpI 1 1 -2.01159
|
|
|
210 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
211 # ORF.0.224_0.295192659405.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
212 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
213 ORF.0.224_0.295192659405.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
214 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
215 # ORF.0.355_0.773691408662.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
216 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
217 ORF.0.355_0.773691408662.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
218 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
219 # ORF.0.571_0.245647554641.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
220 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
221 ORF.0.571_0.245647554641.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
222 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
223 # ORF.0.492_0.914947831416.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 margin=0.188252
|
|
|
224 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
225 ORF.0.492_0.914947831416.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
226 ORF.0.492_0.914947831416.CDS LipoP1.0:Margin CYT 1 1 0.188252
|
|
|
227 ORF.0.492_0.914947831416.CDS LipoP1.0:Class TMH 1 1 -0.389165
|
|
|
228 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
229 # ORF.0.494_0.190486747638.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
230 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
231 ORF.0.494_0.190486747638.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
232 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
233 # ORF.0.33_0.821816667683.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 margin=1.151907
|
|
|
234 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
235 ORF.0.33_0.821816667683.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
236 ORF.0.33_0.821816667683.CDS LipoP1.0:Margin CYT 1 1 1.151907
|
|
|
237 ORF.0.33_0.821816667683.CDS LipoP1.0:Class TMH 1 1 -1.35282
|
|
|
238 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
239 # ORF.0.34_0.707053863467.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
240 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
241 ORF.0.34_0.707053863467.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
242 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
243 # ORF.0.231_0.000923123852602.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
244 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
245 ORF.0.231_0.000923123852602.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
246 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
247 # ORF.0.233_0.405974692709.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
248 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
249 ORF.0.233_0.405974692709.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
250 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
251 # ORF.0.237_0.755472071473.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
252 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
253 ORF.0.237_0.755472071473.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
254 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
255 # ORF.0.238_0.914046339376.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
256 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
257 ORF.0.238_0.914046339376.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
258 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
259 # ORF.0.365_0.2945108684.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
260 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
261 ORF.0.365_0.2945108684.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
262 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
263 # ORF.0.50_0.415010657017.CDS SpII score=5.92551 margin=3.72509 cleavage=17-18 Pos+2=L
|
|
|
264 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
265 ORF.0.50_0.415010657017.CDS LipoP1.0:Best SpII 1 1 5.92551
|
|
|
266 ORF.0.50_0.415010657017.CDS LipoP1.0:Margin SpII 1 1 3.72509
|
|
|
267 ORF.0.50_0.415010657017.CDS LipoP1.0:Class SpI 1 1 2.20042
|
|
|
268 ORF.0.50_0.415010657017.CDS LipoP1.0:Class CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
269 ORF.0.50_0.415010657017.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavII 17 18 5.9255 # ICIIV|CLSWA Pos+2=L
|
|
|
270 ORF.0.50_0.415010657017.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 22 23 2.16267 # CLSWA|VNHYR
|
|
|
271 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
272 # ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS SpII score=19.8902 margin=11.77152 cleavage=19-20 Pos+2=T
|
|
|
273 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
274 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Best SpII 1 1 19.8902
|
|
|
275 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Margin SpII 1 1 11.77152
|
|
|
276 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Class SpI 1 1 8.11868
|
|
|
277 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Class CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
278 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Class TMH 1 1 -1.32568
|
|
|
279 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavII 19 20 19.8902 # LVVVG|CTSKQ Pos+2=T
|
|
|
280 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 25 26 6.80431 # TSKQS|VSQCV
|
|
|
281 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 19 20 6.49651 # LVVVG|CTSKQ
|
|
|
282 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 22 23 5.34572 # VGCTS|KQSVS
|
|
|
283 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 23 24 3.96804 # GCTSK|QSVSQ
|
|
|
284 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 26 27 2.72646 # SKQSV|SQCVK
|
|
|
285 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 27 28 2.57107 # KQSVS|QCVKP
|
|
|
286 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 24 25 1.65562 # CTSKQ|SVSQC
|
|
|
287 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 17 18 1.37856 # LPLVV|VGCTS
|
|
|
288 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 21 22 -0.782641 # VVGCT|SKQSV
|
|
|
289 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 28 29 -1.09651 # QSVSQ|CVKPP
|
|
|
290 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 20 21 -2.99138 # VVVGC|TSKQS
|
|
|
291 # ORF.0.65_0.403948729686.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
292 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
293 ORF.0.65_0.403948729686.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
294 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
295 # ORF.0.380_0.771335496557.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 margin=1.869487
|
|
|
296 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
297 ORF.0.380_0.771335496557.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
298 ORF.0.380_0.771335496557.CDS LipoP1.0:Margin CYT 1 1 1.869487
|
|
|
299 ORF.0.380_0.771335496557.CDS LipoP1.0:Class TMH 1 1 -2.0704
|
|
|
300 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
301 # ORF.0.391_0.169373954797.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
302 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
303 ORF.0.391_0.169373954797.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
304 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
305 # ORF.0.400_0.811321232506.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
306 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
307 ORF.0.400_0.811321232506.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
308 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
309 # ORF.0.260_0.577298671452.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
310 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
311 ORF.0.260_0.577298671452.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
312 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
313 # ORF.0.261_0.357298653378.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
314 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
315 ORF.0.261_0.357298653378.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
316 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
317 # ORF.0.268_0.501011908227.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
318 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
319 ORF.0.268_0.501011908227.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
320 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
321 # ORF.0.269_0.219984821414.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
322 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
323 ORF.0.269_0.219984821414.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
324 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
325 # ORF.0.278_0.44001518346.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
326 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
327 ORF.0.278_0.44001518346.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
328 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
329 # ORF.0.81_0.839099082128.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
330 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
331 ORF.0.81_0.839099082128.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
332 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
|
|
333 # ORF.0.87_0.518549362319.CDS CYT score=-0.200913
|
|
|
334 # Cut-off=-3
|
|
|
335 ORF.0.87_0.518549362319.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913
|
|
|
336 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted
|
