Mercurial > repos > cpt > cpt_lipop_conversion
comparison cpt_lipop_conv/test-data/LipoToGFF_In.txt @ 0:adde21b6bdb3 draft
Uploaded
author | cpt |
---|---|
date | Fri, 13 May 2022 05:18:31 +0000 |
parents | |
children |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
-1:000000000000 | 0:adde21b6bdb3 |
---|---|
1 # ORF.0.472_0.8077298255.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
2 # Cut-off=-3 | |
3 ORF.0.472_0.8077298255.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
4 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
5 # ORF.0.465_0.466377183402.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
6 # Cut-off=-3 | |
7 ORF.0.465_0.466377183402.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
8 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
9 # ORF.0.466_0.685859290271.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
10 # Cut-off=-3 | |
11 ORF.0.466_0.685859290271.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
12 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
13 # ORF.0.468_0.803001272192.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
14 # Cut-off=-3 | |
15 ORF.0.468_0.803001272192.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
16 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
17 # ORF.0.708_0.889453606077.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
18 # Cut-off=-3 | |
19 ORF.0.708_0.889453606077.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
20 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
21 # ORF.0.458_0.61399204562.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
22 # Cut-off=-3 | |
23 ORF.0.458_0.61399204562.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
24 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
25 # ORF.0.459_0.323250347541.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
26 # Cut-off=-3 | |
27 ORF.0.459_0.323250347541.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
28 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
29 # ORF.0.460_0.509039455004.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
30 # Cut-off=-3 | |
31 ORF.0.460_0.509039455004.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
32 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
33 # ORF.0.461_0.392081904542.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
34 # Cut-off=-3 | |
35 ORF.0.461_0.392081904542.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
36 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
37 # ORF.0.699_0.764949625216.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
38 # Cut-off=-3 | |
39 ORF.0.699_0.764949625216.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
40 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
41 # ORF.0.703_0.981371874022.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
42 # Cut-off=-3 | |
43 ORF.0.703_0.981371874022.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
44 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
45 # ORF.0.705_0.438813830323.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
46 # Cut-off=-3 | |
47 ORF.0.705_0.438813830323.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
48 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
49 # ORF.0.622_0.865794102081.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
50 # Cut-off=-3 | |
51 ORF.0.622_0.865794102081.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
52 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
53 # ORF.0.623_0.846988205141.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
54 # Cut-off=-3 | |
55 ORF.0.623_0.846988205141.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
56 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
57 # ORF.0.625_0.0578111846669.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
58 # Cut-off=-3 | |
59 ORF.0.625_0.0578111846669.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
60 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
61 # ORF.0.626_0.303786861772.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
62 # Cut-off=-3 | |
63 ORF.0.626_0.303786861772.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
64 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
65 # ORF.0.630_0.467112600707.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
66 # Cut-off=-3 | |
67 ORF.0.630_0.467112600707.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
68 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
69 # ORF.0.631_0.2883116125.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
70 # Cut-off=-3 | |
71 ORF.0.631_0.2883116125.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
72 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
73 # ORF.0.636_0.876600016398.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
74 # Cut-off=-3 | |
75 ORF.0.636_0.876600016398.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
76 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
77 # ORF.0.640_0.0888066128056.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
78 # Cut-off=-3 | |
79 ORF.0.640_0.0888066128056.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
80 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
81 # ORF.0.655_0.212962186525.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
82 # Cut-off=-3 | |
83 ORF.0.655_0.212962186525.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
84 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
85 # ORF.0.659_0.370352364369.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
86 # Cut-off=-3 | |
87 ORF.0.659_0.370352364369.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
88 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
89 # ORF.0.660_0.561664408596.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
90 # Cut-off=-3 | |
91 ORF.0.660_0.561664408596.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
92 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
93 # ORF.0.662_0.547739243117.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
94 # Cut-off=-3 | |
95 ORF.0.662_0.547739243117.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
96 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
97 # ORF.0.667_0.381504311163.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
98 # Cut-off=-3 | |
99 ORF.0.667_0.381504311163.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
100 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
101 # ORF.0.457_0.112605087319.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
102 # Cut-off=-3 | |
103 ORF.0.457_0.112605087319.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
104 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
105 # ORF.0.518_0.704496503167.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
106 # Cut-off=-3 | |
107 ORF.0.518_0.704496503167.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
108 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
109 # ORF.0.531_0.284124356131.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
110 # Cut-off=-3 | |
111 ORF.0.531_0.284124356131.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
112 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
113 # ORF.0.534_0.230486359187.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
114 # Cut-off=-3 | |
115 ORF.0.534_0.230486359187.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
116 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
117 # ORF.0.549_0.435747482069.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
118 # Cut-off=-3 | |
119 ORF.0.549_0.435747482069.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
120 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
121 # ORF.0.603_0.488926379773.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
122 # Cut-off=-3 | |
123 ORF.0.603_0.488926379773.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
124 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
125 # ORF.0.605_0.950422684088.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
126 # Cut-off=-3 | |
127 ORF.0.605_0.950422684088.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
128 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
129 # ORF.0.606_0.329949811104.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
130 # Cut-off=-3 | |
131 ORF.0.606_0.329949811104.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
132 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
133 # ORF.0.611_0.815705221168.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
134 # Cut-off=-3 | |
135 ORF.0.611_0.815705221168.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
136 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
137 # ORF.0.613_0.104890641676.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
138 # Cut-off=-3 | |
139 ORF.0.613_0.104890641676.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
140 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
141 # ORF.0.17_0.711047642618.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
142 # Cut-off=-3 | |
143 ORF.0.17_0.711047642618.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
144 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
145 # ORF.0.139_0.904626958426.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
146 # Cut-off=-3 | |
147 ORF.0.139_0.904626958426.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
148 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
149 # ORF.0.445_0.286571403109.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
150 # Cut-off=-3 | |
151 ORF.0.445_0.286571403109.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
152 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
153 # ORF.0.345_0.971616620883.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
154 # Cut-off=-3 | |
155 ORF.0.345_0.971616620883.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
156 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
157 # ORF.0.347_0.0208968983552.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
158 # Cut-off=-3 | |
159 ORF.0.347_0.0208968983552.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
160 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
161 # ORF.0.517_0.929120702544.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
162 # Cut-off=-3 | |
163 ORF.0.517_0.929120702544.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
164 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
165 # ORF.0.146_0.351389104617.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
166 # Cut-off=-3 | |
167 ORF.0.146_0.351389104617.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
168 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
169 # ORF.0.439_0.445866101899.CDS TMH score=6.51858 margin=6.713639 | |
170 # Cut-off=-3 | |
171 ORF.0.439_0.445866101899.CDS LipoP1.0:Best TMH 1 1 6.51858 | |
172 ORF.0.439_0.445866101899.CDS LipoP1.0:Margin TMH 1 1 6.713639 | |
173 ORF.0.439_0.445866101899.CDS LipoP1.0:Class SpI 1 1 -0.195059 | |
174 ORF.0.439_0.445866101899.CDS LipoP1.0:Class CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
175 ORF.0.439_0.445866101899.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 20 21 -0.295218 # SPGVP|CIMLL | |
176 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
177 # ORF.0.440_0.915263915342.CDS TMH score=0.241158 margin=0.442071 | |
178 # Cut-off=-3 | |
179 ORF.0.440_0.915263915342.CDS LipoP1.0:Best TMH 1 1 0.241158 | |
180 ORF.0.440_0.915263915342.CDS LipoP1.0:Margin TMH 1 1 0.442071 | |
181 ORF.0.440_0.915263915342.CDS LipoP1.0:Class CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
182 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
183 # ORF.0.183_0.0663532791257.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
184 # Cut-off=-3 | |
185 ORF.0.183_0.0663532791257.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
186 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
187 # ORF.0.185_0.343675913625.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
188 # Cut-off=-3 | |
189 ORF.0.185_0.343675913625.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
190 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
191 # ORF.0.580_0.42130451371.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
192 # Cut-off=-3 | |
193 ORF.0.580_0.42130451371.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
194 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
195 # ORF.0.429_0.211525337226.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 margin=0.370359 | |
196 # Cut-off=-3 | |
197 ORF.0.429_0.211525337226.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
198 ORF.0.429_0.211525337226.CDS LipoP1.0:Margin CYT 1 1 0.370359 | |
199 ORF.0.429_0.211525337226.CDS LipoP1.0:Class TMH 1 1 -0.571272 | |
200 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
201 # ORF.0.202_0.502577350308.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
202 # Cut-off=-3 | |
203 ORF.0.202_0.502577350308.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
204 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
205 # ORF.0.217_0.854168148494.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 margin=1.810677 | |
206 # Cut-off=-3 | |
207 ORF.0.217_0.854168148494.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
208 ORF.0.217_0.854168148494.CDS LipoP1.0:Margin CYT 1 1 1.810677 | |
209 ORF.0.217_0.854168148494.CDS LipoP1.0:Class SpI 1 1 -2.01159 | |
210 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
211 # ORF.0.224_0.295192659405.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
212 # Cut-off=-3 | |
213 ORF.0.224_0.295192659405.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
214 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
215 # ORF.0.355_0.773691408662.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
216 # Cut-off=-3 | |
217 ORF.0.355_0.773691408662.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
218 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
219 # ORF.0.571_0.245647554641.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
220 # Cut-off=-3 | |
221 ORF.0.571_0.245647554641.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
222 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
223 # ORF.0.492_0.914947831416.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 margin=0.188252 | |
224 # Cut-off=-3 | |
225 ORF.0.492_0.914947831416.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
226 ORF.0.492_0.914947831416.CDS LipoP1.0:Margin CYT 1 1 0.188252 | |
227 ORF.0.492_0.914947831416.CDS LipoP1.0:Class TMH 1 1 -0.389165 | |
228 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
229 # ORF.0.494_0.190486747638.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
230 # Cut-off=-3 | |
231 ORF.0.494_0.190486747638.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
232 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
233 # ORF.0.33_0.821816667683.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 margin=1.151907 | |
234 # Cut-off=-3 | |
235 ORF.0.33_0.821816667683.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
236 ORF.0.33_0.821816667683.CDS LipoP1.0:Margin CYT 1 1 1.151907 | |
237 ORF.0.33_0.821816667683.CDS LipoP1.0:Class TMH 1 1 -1.35282 | |
238 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
239 # ORF.0.34_0.707053863467.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
240 # Cut-off=-3 | |
241 ORF.0.34_0.707053863467.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
242 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
243 # ORF.0.231_0.000923123852602.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
244 # Cut-off=-3 | |
245 ORF.0.231_0.000923123852602.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
246 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
247 # ORF.0.233_0.405974692709.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
248 # Cut-off=-3 | |
249 ORF.0.233_0.405974692709.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
250 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
251 # ORF.0.237_0.755472071473.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
252 # Cut-off=-3 | |
253 ORF.0.237_0.755472071473.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
254 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
255 # ORF.0.238_0.914046339376.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
256 # Cut-off=-3 | |
257 ORF.0.238_0.914046339376.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
258 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
259 # ORF.0.365_0.2945108684.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
260 # Cut-off=-3 | |
261 ORF.0.365_0.2945108684.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
262 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
263 # ORF.0.50_0.415010657017.CDS SpII score=5.92551 margin=3.72509 cleavage=17-18 Pos+2=L | |
264 # Cut-off=-3 | |
265 ORF.0.50_0.415010657017.CDS LipoP1.0:Best SpII 1 1 5.92551 | |
266 ORF.0.50_0.415010657017.CDS LipoP1.0:Margin SpII 1 1 3.72509 | |
267 ORF.0.50_0.415010657017.CDS LipoP1.0:Class SpI 1 1 2.20042 | |
268 ORF.0.50_0.415010657017.CDS LipoP1.0:Class CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
269 ORF.0.50_0.415010657017.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavII 17 18 5.9255 # ICIIV|CLSWA Pos+2=L | |
270 ORF.0.50_0.415010657017.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 22 23 2.16267 # CLSWA|VNHYR | |
271 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
272 # ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS SpII score=19.8902 margin=11.77152 cleavage=19-20 Pos+2=T | |
273 # Cut-off=-3 | |
274 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Best SpII 1 1 19.8902 | |
275 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Margin SpII 1 1 11.77152 | |
276 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Class SpI 1 1 8.11868 | |
277 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Class CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
278 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Class TMH 1 1 -1.32568 | |
279 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavII 19 20 19.8902 # LVVVG|CTSKQ Pos+2=T | |
280 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 25 26 6.80431 # TSKQS|VSQCV | |
281 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 19 20 6.49651 # LVVVG|CTSKQ | |
282 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 22 23 5.34572 # VGCTS|KQSVS | |
283 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 23 24 3.96804 # GCTSK|QSVSQ | |
284 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 26 27 2.72646 # SKQSV|SQCVK | |
285 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 27 28 2.57107 # KQSVS|QCVKP | |
286 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 24 25 1.65562 # CTSKQ|SVSQC | |
287 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 17 18 1.37856 # LPLVV|VGCTS | |
288 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 21 22 -0.782641 # VVGCT|SKQSV | |
289 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 28 29 -1.09651 # QSVSQ|CVKPP | |
290 ORF.0.247_0.938715889806.CDS LipoP1.0:Signal CleavI 20 21 -2.99138 # VVVGC|TSKQS | |
291 # ORF.0.65_0.403948729686.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
292 # Cut-off=-3 | |
293 ORF.0.65_0.403948729686.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
294 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
295 # ORF.0.380_0.771335496557.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 margin=1.869487 | |
296 # Cut-off=-3 | |
297 ORF.0.380_0.771335496557.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
298 ORF.0.380_0.771335496557.CDS LipoP1.0:Margin CYT 1 1 1.869487 | |
299 ORF.0.380_0.771335496557.CDS LipoP1.0:Class TMH 1 1 -2.0704 | |
300 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
301 # ORF.0.391_0.169373954797.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
302 # Cut-off=-3 | |
303 ORF.0.391_0.169373954797.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
304 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
305 # ORF.0.400_0.811321232506.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
306 # Cut-off=-3 | |
307 ORF.0.400_0.811321232506.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
308 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
309 # ORF.0.260_0.577298671452.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
310 # Cut-off=-3 | |
311 ORF.0.260_0.577298671452.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
312 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
313 # ORF.0.261_0.357298653378.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
314 # Cut-off=-3 | |
315 ORF.0.261_0.357298653378.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
316 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
317 # ORF.0.268_0.501011908227.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
318 # Cut-off=-3 | |
319 ORF.0.268_0.501011908227.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
320 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
321 # ORF.0.269_0.219984821414.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
322 # Cut-off=-3 | |
323 ORF.0.269_0.219984821414.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
324 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
325 # ORF.0.278_0.44001518346.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
326 # Cut-off=-3 | |
327 ORF.0.278_0.44001518346.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
328 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
329 # ORF.0.81_0.839099082128.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
330 # Cut-off=-3 | |
331 ORF.0.81_0.839099082128.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
332 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted | |
333 # ORF.0.87_0.518549362319.CDS CYT score=-0.200913 | |
334 # Cut-off=-3 | |
335 ORF.0.87_0.518549362319.CDS LipoP1.0:Best CYT 1 1 -0.200913 | |
336 # NO PLOT made - less than 4 putative cleavage sites predicted |