# HG changeset patch
# User iuc
# Date 1538177429 14400
# Node ID db1eeffba23e9bfe3b088f1df2ee415a62d2bb19
planemo upload for repository https://github.com/galaxyproject/tools-iuc/tree/master/tools/nanoplot/ commit ad3c2e459ae53ab61df3d967d755fd0b42149328
diff -r 000000000000 -r db1eeffba23e nanoplot.xml
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/nanoplot.xml	Fri Sep 28 19:30:29 2018 -0400
@@ -0,0 +1,468 @@
+
+    Plotting suite for Oxford Nanopore sequencing data and alignments
+    
+        nanoplot
+    
+    
+        
+    
+    
+        
+            
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+            
+            
+                
+            
+            
+                
+            
+            
+                
+            
+            
+                
+            
+            
+                
+            
+            
+                
+            
+            
+                
+            
+        
+        
+            
+            
+            
+            
+            
+            
+            
+            
+            
+                
+                
+                
+            
+            
+        
+        
+            
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+                
+            
+            
+                
+                
+                
+            
+            
+                
+                
+                
+                
+            
+            
+            
+        
+    
+    
+        
+        
+        
+        
+            
+                
+                
+            
+        
+        
+            
+                
+                
+            
+        
+    
+    
+        
+            
+                
+                
+            
+            
+            
+            
+            
+            
+            
+        
+        
+            
+                
+                
+            
+            
+            
+            
+            
+        
+
+    
+    
+        
+    
+    
+        
+            @misc{githubnanoplot, author = {De Coster, Wouter}, year = {2018}, title =
+            {NanoPlot}, publisher = {GitHub}, journal = {GitHub repository}, url =
+            {https://github.com/wdecoster/NanoPlot}, }
+        10.1093/bioinformatics/bty149
+    
+
diff -r 000000000000 -r db1eeffba23e test-data/HistogramReadlength.jpg
Binary file test-data/HistogramReadlength.jpg has changed
diff -r 000000000000 -r db1eeffba23e test-data/NanoPlot-report.html
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/test-data/NanoPlot-report.html	Fri Sep 28 19:30:29 2018 -0400
@@ -0,0 +1,362 @@
+
+
+    
+    
+        
+        NanoPlot Report
+    
+
+ NanoPlot report
+
Summary statistics prior to filtering
+
+
+
+|
+
+	| General summary:+ | 
+
+	| Active channels: | 169+ | 
+
+	| Mean read length: | 23212.6+ | 
+
+	| Mean read quality: | 10.1+ | 
+
+	| Median read length: | 9390.0+ | 
+
+	| Median read quality: | 10.3+ | 
+
+	| Number of reads: | 371+ | 
+
+	| Read length N50: | 60395+ | 
+
+	| Total bases: | 8611871+ | 
+
+|
+
+	| Number, percentage and megabases of reads above quality cutoffs+ | 
+
+	| >Q5: | 371 (100.0%) 8.6Mb+ | 
+
+	| >Q7: | 371 (100.0%) 8.6Mb+ | 
+
+	| >Q10: | 207 (55.8%) 4.7Mb+ | 
+
+	| >Q12: | 49 (13.2%) 0.9Mb+ | 
+
+	| >Q15: | 0 (0.0%) 0.0Mb+ | 
+
+|
+
+	| Top 5 highest mean basecall quality scores and their read lengths+ | 
+
+	| 1: | 13.3 (6333)+ | 
+
+	| 2: | 13.1 (5448)+ | 
+
+	| 3: | 12.9 (27834)+ | 
+
+	| 4: | 12.8 (20351)+ | 
+
+	| 5: | 12.8 (97730)+ | 
+
+|
+
+	| Top 5 longest reads and their mean basecall quality score+ | 
+
+	| 1: | 393431 (10.6)+ | 
+
+	| 2: | 341725 (11.8)+ | 
+
+	| 3: | 320662 (8.0)+ | 
+
+	| 4: | 226843 (9.1)+ | 
+
+	| 5: | 221901 (10.0)+ | 
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Summary statistics after filtering
+
+
+
+|
+
+	| General summary:+ | 
+
+	| Active channels: | 169+ | 
+
+	| Mean read length: | 23212.6+ | 
+
+	| Mean read quality: | 10.1+ | 
+
+	| Median read length: | 9390.0+ | 
+
+	| Median read quality: | 10.3+ | 
+
+	| Number of reads: | 371+ | 
+
+	| Read length N50: | 60395+ | 
+
+	| Total bases: | 8611871+ | 
+
+|
+
+	| Number, percentage and megabases of reads above quality cutoffs+ | 
+
+	| >Q5: | 371 (100.0%) 8.6Mb+ | 
+
+	| >Q7: | 371 (100.0%) 8.6Mb+ | 
+
+	| >Q10: | 207 (55.8%) 4.7Mb+ | 
+
+	| >Q12: | 49 (13.2%) 0.9Mb+ | 
+
+	| >Q15: | 0 (0.0%) 0.0Mb+ | 
+
+|
+
+	| Top 5 highest mean basecall quality scores and their read lengths+ | 
+
+	| 1: | 13.3 (6333)+ | 
+
+	| 2: | 13.1 (5448)+ | 
+
+	| 3: | 12.9 (27834)+ | 
+
+	| 4: | 12.8 (20351)+ | 
+
+	| 5: | 12.8 (97730)+ | 
+
+|
+
+	| Top 5 longest reads and their mean basecall quality score+ | 
+
+	| 1: | 393431 (10.6)+ | 
+
+	| 2: | 341725 (11.8)+ | 
+
+	| 3: | 320662 (8.0)+ | 
+
+	| 4: | 226843 (9.1)+ | 
+
+	| 5: | 221901 (10.0)+ | 
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Plots
+
+
Histogram of read lengths
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Weighted Histogram of read lengths
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Yield by length
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Read lengths vs Average read quality plot using hexagonal bins
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Read lengths vs Average read quality plot using a kernel density estimation
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Number of reads generated per channel
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Cumulative yield
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Cumulative yield
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Number of reads over time
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Number of active pores over time
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Violin plot of read lengths over time
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Violin plot of quality over time
+

+
+
+
+
+
 
\ No newline at end of file
diff -r 000000000000 -r db1eeffba23e test-data/NanoStats.txt
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/test-data/NanoStats.txt	Fri Sep 28 19:30:29 2018 -0400
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+General summary:	 
+Active channels:	169
+Mean read length:	23212.6
+Mean read quality:	10.1
+Median read length:	9390.0
+Median read quality:	10.3
+Number of reads:	371
+Read length N50:	60395
+Total bases:	8611871
+Number, percentage and megabases of reads above quality cutoffs
+>Q5:	371 (100.0%) 8.6Mb
+>Q7:	371 (100.0%) 8.6Mb
+>Q10:	207 (55.8%) 4.7Mb
+>Q12:	49 (13.2%) 0.9Mb
+>Q15:	0 (0.0%) 0.0Mb
+Top 5 highest mean basecall quality scores and their read lengths
+1:	13.3 (6333)
+2:	13.1 (5448)
+3:	12.9 (27834)
+4:	12.8 (20351)
+5:	12.8 (97730)
+Top 5 longest reads and their mean basecall quality score
+1:	393431 (10.6)
+2:	341725 (11.8)
+3:	320662 (8.0)
+4:	226843 (9.1)
+5:	221901 (10.0)
diff -r 000000000000 -r db1eeffba23e test-data/NanoStats_post_filtering.txt
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/test-data/NanoStats_post_filtering.txt	Fri Sep 28 19:30:29 2018 -0400
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+General summary:	 
+Active channels:	169
+Mean read length:	23212.6
+Mean read quality:	10.1
+Median read length:	9390.0
+Median read quality:	10.3
+Number of reads:	371
+Read length N50:	60395
+Total bases:	8611871
+Number, percentage and megabases of reads above quality cutoffs
+>Q5:	371 (100.0%) 8.6Mb
+>Q7:	371 (100.0%) 8.6Mb
+>Q10:	207 (55.8%) 4.7Mb
+>Q12:	49 (13.2%) 0.9Mb
+>Q15:	0 (0.0%) 0.0Mb
+Top 5 highest mean basecall quality scores and their read lengths
+1:	13.3 (6333)
+2:	13.1 (5448)
+3:	12.9 (27834)
+4:	12.8 (20351)
+5:	12.8 (97730)
+Top 5 longest reads and their mean basecall quality score
+1:	393431 (10.6)
+2:	341725 (11.8)
+3:	320662 (8.0)
+4:	226843 (9.1)
+5:	221901 (10.0)
diff -r 000000000000 -r db1eeffba23e test-data/alignment.bam
Binary file test-data/alignment.bam has changed
diff -r 000000000000 -r db1eeffba23e test-data/bam-LogTransformed_HistogramReadlength.svg
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/test-data/bam-LogTransformed_HistogramReadlength.svg	Fri Sep 28 19:30:29 2018 -0400
@@ -0,0 +1,927 @@
+
+
+
+
diff -r 000000000000 -r db1eeffba23e test-data/bam-report.html
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/test-data/bam-report.html	Fri Sep 28 19:30:29 2018 -0400
@@ -0,0 +1,401 @@
+
+
+    
+    
+        
+        NanoPlot Report
+    
+
+ NanoPlot report
+
Summary statistics prior to filtering
+
+
+
+|
+
+	| General summary:+ | 
+
+	| Average percent identity: | 85.3+ | 
+
+	| Mean read length: | 12291.0+ | 
+
+	| Mean read quality: | 13.2+ | 
+
+	| Median percent identity: | 87.3+ | 
+
+	| Median read length: | 7577.0+ | 
+
+	| Median read quality: | 13.5+ | 
+
+	| Number of reads: | 1115+ | 
+
+	| Read length N50: | 21987+ | 
+
+	| Total bases: | 13704509+ | 
+
+	| Total bases aligned: | 12343518+ | 
+
+|
+
+	| Number, percentage and megabases of reads above quality cutoffs+ | 
+
+	| >Q5: | 1115 (100.0%) 13.7Mb+ | 
+
+	| >Q7: | 1115 (100.0%) 13.7Mb+ | 
+
+	| >Q10: | 1098 (98.5%) 13.6Mb+ | 
+
+	| >Q12: | 936 (83.9%) 11.9Mb+ | 
+
+	| >Q15: | 10 (0.9%) 0.0Mb+ | 
+
+|
+
+	| Top 5 highest mean basecall quality scores and their read lengths+ | 
+
+	| 1: | 15.7 (1461; SRR5665597.758)+ | 
+
+	| 2: | 15.5 (1790; SRR5665597.725)+ | 
+
+	| 3: | 15.5 (615; SRR5665597.293)+ | 
+
+	| 4: | 15.5 (162; SRR5665597.876)+ | 
+
+	| 5: | 15.5 (626; SRR5665597.822)+ | 
+
+|
+
+	| Top 5 longest reads and their mean basecall quality score+ | 
+
+	| 1: | 99139 (13.9; SRR5665597.31)+ | 
+
+	| 2: | 80522 (13.5; SRR5665597.790)+ | 
+
+	| 3: | 79569 (13.5; SRR5665597.332)+ | 
+
+	| 4: | 70195 (10.2; SRR5665597.799)+ | 
+
+	| 5: | 69426 (12.2; SRR5665597.1000)+ | 
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Summary statistics after filtering
+
+
+
+|
+
+	| General summary:+ | 
+
+	| Average percent identity: | 85.0+ | 
+
+	| Mean read length: | 1436.3+ | 
+
+	| Mean read quality: | 13.1+ | 
+
+	| Median percent identity: | 86.8+ | 
+
+	| Median read length: | 1419.5+ | 
+
+	| Median read quality: | 13.4+ | 
+
+	| Number of reads: | 80+ | 
+
+	| Read length N50: | 1474+ | 
+
+	| Total bases: | 114904+ | 
+
+	| Total bases aligned: | 110215+ | 
+
+|
+
+	| Number, percentage and megabases of reads above quality cutoffs+ | 
+
+	| >Q5: | 80 (100.0%) 0.1Mb+ | 
+
+	| >Q7: | 80 (100.0%) 0.1Mb+ | 
+
+	| >Q10: | 77 (96.2%) 0.1Mb+ | 
+
+	| >Q12: | 64 (80.0%) 0.1Mb+ | 
+
+	| >Q15: | 3 (3.8%) 0.0Mb+ | 
+
+|
+
+	| Top 5 highest mean basecall quality scores and their read lengths+ | 
+
+	| 1: | 15.7 (1461; SRR5665597.758)+ | 
+
+	| 2: | 15.5 (1790; SRR5665597.725)+ | 
+
+	| 3: | 15.1 (1474; SRR5665597.822)+ | 
+
+	| 4: | 14.7 (1985; SRR5665597.268)+ | 
+
+	| 5: | 14.6 (1726; SRR5665597.119)+ | 
+
+|
+
+	| Top 5 longest reads and their mean basecall quality score+ | 
+
+	| 1: | 1985 (14.7; SRR5665597.268)+ | 
+
+	| 2: | 1981 (13.2; SRR5665597.912)+ | 
+
+	| 3: | 1969 (13.2; SRR5665597.827)+ | 
+
+	| 4: | 1955 (13.2; SRR5665597.213)+ | 
+
+	| 5: | 1930 (11.1; SRR5665597.21)+ | 
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Plots
+
+
Histogram of read lengths
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Weighted Histogram of read lengths
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Yield by length
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Read lengths vs Average read quality plot using dots
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Read lengths vs Average read quality plot using a kernel density estimation
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Aligned read lengths vs Sequenced read length plot using dots
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Aligned read lengths vs Sequenced read length plot using a kernel density estimation
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Read mapping quality vs Average basecall quality plot using dots
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Read mapping quality vs Average basecall quality plot using a kernel density estimation
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Read length vs Read mapping quality plot using dots
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Read length vs Read mapping quality plot using a kernel density estimation
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Percent identity vs Average Base Quality plot using dots
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Percent identity vs Average Base Quality plot using a kernel density estimation
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Aligned read length vs Percent identity plot using dots
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Aligned read length vs Percent identity plot using a kernel density estimation
+

+
+
+
+
+
 
\ No newline at end of file
diff -r 000000000000 -r db1eeffba23e test-data/reads.fastq.gz
Binary file test-data/reads.fastq.gz has changed